Legal Opinion
Watson v. Tayco, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Decided October 2, 2002No. CA 01-1193PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Olly Neal, Judge.
The appellant, Dianna Watson, appeals from the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission (Commission) denying her claim for workers’ compensation benefits because she failed to establish a compensa-ble closed-head injury. We affirm.
The appellant was employed at a McDonald’s owned by the appefiee, Tayco, Inc. On May 10, 2000, while restocking cartons at the fry station, the appellant was hit on the back of the head by a metal plate that fell from the top of the fry station. The appellant experienced such “immense” pain in her neck and head, that she sought treatment in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- White v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Carman v. Haworth, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. StottsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
- Campbell v. Randal Tyler Ford Mercury, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
- Wentz v. Service MasterCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Parson v. Arkansas Methodist HospitalCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008
- Rippe v. Delbert Hooten LoggingCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
- Myers v. City of RockportCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
- Multi-Craft Contractors, Inc. v. YouseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
- Rodriguez v. M. McDaniel Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.