Legal Opinion

Hayes v. Wal-Mart Stores

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 25, 2000No. CA 00-216PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John Mauzy Pittman, Judge.

The appellant in this workers’ compensation case injured her left shoulder at work in the Wal-Mart floral department. After treatment, she could no longer move her arm sufficiently to carry out her duties in the floral department and was demoted to greeter. She filed a claim for permanent partial disability benefits. The Commission denied the claim, finding that the range-of-motion studies conducted by her physician did not satisfy the statutory requirement that a finding of impairment must be supported by objective physical findings. This appeal followed.

For…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Geo Specialty Chemical, Inc. v. ClinganCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Continental Express, Inc. v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Department of Parks & Tourism v. HelmsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Flowers v. Arkansas Highway & Transportation DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Smurfit Stone ContainerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Mays v. Alumnitec, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Flowers v. Arkansas State PoliceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  5. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API