Duke v. Regis Hairstylists

John Mauzy Pittman, Judge.

The appellant, Cynthia Duke, filed a claim for benefits alleging that she developed carpal tunnel syndrome early in 1994 as a result of her job with the appellee, Regis Hairstylists. On de novo review, the Commission denied and dismissed the claim, finding that appellant failed to establish her injury with medical evidence supported by objective findings. On appeal, appellant contends that there were objective findings sufficient to establish a compensable injury. We disagree, and we affirm.

Arkansas Code Annotated § ll-9-102(5)(D) (Repl. 1996) provides that a…