Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Norfolk-Southern Railway, Co.

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided March 4, 1998No. Civ.A. 97-C-956-SPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*581ORDER

CARROLL, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

This cause is currently before the court on a Motion for Examination Pursuant to Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, filed by the defendant, Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Inc., on January 29,1998. The motion was amended on February 13, 1998 to provide information concerning the specific examination Norfolk Southern is requesting. The plaintiff has filed a response to the motion and Norfolk Southern has filed a reply. Norfolk Southern seeks an order from this court requiring Katrina Pearson, a minor and the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Peters v. NelsonDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1994
  3. Lemond Const. Co. v. WheelerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  4. Savage Industries, Inc. v. DukeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  5. Marroni v. MateyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  2. Doe v. West Lake AcademyMassachusetts Superior Court · 1999
  3. Ray v. Missouri Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2021
  4. Rousseau v. CoatesDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2019
  5. Saunders v. Hamm (DEATH PENALTY)District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API