Legal Opinion

Rousseau v. Coates

District Court, D. Vermont

Decided July 17, 2019No. 2:18-cv-00205Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT CHERYL ROUSSEAU and PETER : ROUSSEAU, : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : Case No. 2:18-cv-205 : JOHN BOYD COATES, III, M.D., : and CENTRAL VERMONT MEDICAL : CENTER, INC., : : Defendants. : RULING ON MOTION TO COMPEL A RULE 35 BUCCAL SWAB Plaintiffs Cheryl and Peter Rousseau move the Court to compel Defendant John Boyd Coates, III, M.D. to submit to a buccal swab of the inside of his cheek for the purpose of obtaining his DNA. The Rousseaus allege that in 1977, Dr. Coates wrongfully and fraudulently inseminated Cheryl Rousseau with his own genetic…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Beach v. BeachCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  3. The Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Hiram Negron TorresCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1958
  4. Pearson v. Norfolk-Southern Railway, Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1998
  5. D'angelo v. PotterDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API