Marroni v. Matey
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
HUYETT, District Judge.
The Marroni plaintiffs instituted suit against Raymond Matey and Gary S. Matey for injuries sustained by Michele Marroni when she was allegedly struck by a pleasure boat owned by Raymond Matey and operated by his son, Gary Matey. Raymond Ma*372tey subsequently instituted proceedings for limitation of his liability to the value of the boat pursuant to 46 U.S.C. § 183. The Marroni plaintiffs have moved pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 35(a) for an order that Gary Matey submit to psychological testing. The Marroni plaintiffs contend that because of his…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
3Cited by16 opinions
- Coates v. WhittingtonTexas Supreme Court · 1988
- Cody v. Marriott Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1984
- Schottenstein v. SchottensteinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Lahr v. Fulbright & Jaworski, L.L.P.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1995
- Anson v. FickelDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.