Legal Opinion

Marroni v. Matey

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 27, 1979No. Civ. A. Nos. 78-3065, 78-4327PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

HUYETT, District Judge.

The Marroni plaintiffs instituted suit against Raymond Matey and Gary S. Matey for injuries sustained by Michele Marroni when she was allegedly struck by a pleasure boat owned by Raymond Matey and operated by his son, Gary Matey. Raymond Ma*372tey subsequently instituted proceedings for limitation of his liability to the value of the boat pursuant to 46 U.S.C. § 183. The Marroni plaintiffs have moved pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 35(a) for an order that Gary Matey submit to psychological testing. The Marroni plaintiffs contend that because of his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Coates v. WhittingtonTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Cody v. Marriott Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1984
  3. Schottenstein v. SchottensteinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  4. Lahr v. Fulbright & Jaworski, L.L.P.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1995
  5. Anson v. FickelDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API