Mellish v. Frog Mountain Pet Care
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.
¶1 We granted Martin Mellish’s petition to review a decision of the Court of Appeals in which that court held that Mellish’s land use petition was untimely. The primary issue before us is whether a motion for reconsideration Mellish filed with a county hearing examiner tolled the running of the 21-day time limit for filing his land use petition in superior court until such time as the motion for reconsideration was decided. We conclude that it did and, consequently, reverse the Court of Appeals.
I
¶2 Harold and Jane Elyea, the owners of Frog Mountain Pet Care, applied to Jefferson County…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Wenatchee Sportsmen Ass'n v. Chelan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Watch v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Samuel's Furniture, Inc. v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lauer v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- Patterson v. SegaleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Ferguson v. City of DaytonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Ferguson v. City of DaytonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Applewood Estates Homeowners Ass'n v. City of RichlandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.