Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Segale

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 15, 2012No. 67420-0-IPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDwyer, J.

¶1 In order to seek judicial review of an agency decision pursuant to the Washington Administrative Procedure Act (APA), chapter 34.05 RCW, a person must demonstrate that he or she is aggrieved or adversely affected by the agency decision. This requires a showing of an injury-in-fact — the person must demonstrate that he or *254she is (or will be) specifically and perceptibly harmed by the agency action and, moreover, that this injury will be redressed by a favorable decision by the reviewing court. Where a person alleges an injury that is merely conjectural or hypothetical, there is no standing…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Save a Valuable Environment v. City of BothellWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Medical Waste Associates, Inc. v. Maryland Waste Coalition, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  5. St. Joseph Hospital & Health Care Center v. Department of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Burlington v. Washington State Liquor Control BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  2. Automotive United Trades Organization, V Washington Public DisclCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  3. Benton County Water Conservancy Bd. v. Dep't of EcologyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023
  4. Benton County Water Conservancy Bd. v. Dep't of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Freedom Foundation v. Bethel School District, At Al.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API