Samuel's Furniture, Inc. v. Department of Ecology
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBridge, J.
— Petitioners Samuel’s Furniture, Inc., and Jaffa Holdings, Inc. (Samuel’s) seek reversal of a Court of Appeals opinion in favor of the Department of Ecology (Ecology). Samuel’s contends that Ecology was required to appeal the City of Ferndale’s (City) decision to issue fill and grade and building permits and to rescind a stop work order because Samuel’s proposed construction project was not within the shoreline jurisdiction of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 (SMA), chapter 90.58 RCW, under the rules established by the Land Use Petition Act (LUPA), *444chapter 36.70C RCW. The Court of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Wenatchee Sportsmen Ass'n v. Chelan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Sintra, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Tunstall v. BergesonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Watch v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Durland v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- Asche v. BloomquistCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Asche v. BloomquistCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Conom v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2005
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.