Legal Opinion

Reilly v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 3, 1986No. Appeal, No. 3667 C.D. 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Senior Judge Barbieri,

Before the Court is the petition of Charles Thomas Reilly, Claimant, seeking review of an order of The Workmens Compensation Appeal Board (Board), dated November 29, 1984, dismissing Claimants Reinstatement Petition and denying Claimants right to be heard on the basis of an appeal nunc pro tunc from a referees decision, a decision which consisted of the recital of a stipulation and an order based thereon dismissing a claim petition. Unfortunately, the tortuous *490and unduly prolonged course this case has taken in Claimants efforts to achieve consideration by the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Halaski v. Hilton HotelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Woolsey v. Panhandle Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Guy v. Stoecklein Baking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Rollins Outdoor Advertising v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Temple v. Pennsylvania Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cahill v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Reilly v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Cahill v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Eicholtz v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API