Legal Opinion

Cahill v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 31, 1991No. 647 C.D. 1990Published

1Opinion of the Court

137 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 442 (1991)

586 A.2d 522

Robert CAHILL, Petitioner,

v.

WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (NORTH AMERICAN COAL CORPORATION), Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Submitted on Briefs October 12, 1990.

Decided January 31, 1991.

Timothy P. Creany, Pawlowski, Creany & Tulowitzki, Ebensburg, for petitioner.

Nancy M. Harris, Tillman & Thompson, Pittsburgh, for respondent.

Before PALLADINO and BYER, JJ., and BARBIERI, Senior Judge.

BARBIERI, Senior Judge.

Robert Cahill (Claimant) seeks review of the decision and order of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Unora v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Rollins Outdoor Advertising v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Pittsburgh Press Co. & Vigilant Insurance v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API