Freeman v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Darryl Edward Freeman v. State of Maryland, No. 24, September Term, 2023. Opinion by Hotten, J. EVIDENCE – MARYLAND RULES 5-701 AND 5-702 – DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN LAY AND EXPERT TESTIMONY The Supreme Court of Maryland held that testimony by a police officer who opined regarding the definition of the slang term “lick” did not fall under Maryland Rule 5-702. Ragland v. State and its progeny instruct that a witness must be qualified as an expert under Maryland Rule 5-702 when their testimony is beyond the “ken” of a layperson. 385 Md. 706,
870 A.2d 609
(2005). Opining to the colloquial definition…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Armstead v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Ehrlich v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Ragland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Nalls & Melvin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jun v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2026