Legal Opinion

Freeman v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 16, 2024No. 24/23PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Darryl Edward Freeman v. State of Maryland, No. 24, September Term, 2023. Opinion by Hotten, J. EVIDENCE – MARYLAND RULES 5-701 AND 5-702 – DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN LAY AND EXPERT TESTIMONY The Supreme Court of Maryland held that testimony by a police officer who opined regarding the definition of the slang term “lick” did not fall under Maryland Rule 5-702. Ragland v. State and its progeny instruct that a witness must be qualified as an expert under Maryland Rule 5-702 when their testimony is beyond the “ken” of a layperson. 385 Md. 706,

870 A.2d 609

(2005). Opining to the colloquial definition…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Armstead v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  2. Ehrlich v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Ragland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  5. Nalls & Melvin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jun v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API