Nalls & Melvin v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtGreene, J.
In this opinion, we address challenges that have arisen since the issuance of our decision in Valonis & Tyler v. State, 431 Md. 551, 66 A.3d 661 (2013). In that case, we held that trial judges must comply with Maryland Rule 4-246(b) in order to accomplish the purpose of the Rule, that is, to protect the personal and fundamental constitutional right of a criminal defendant to a trial by jury. In light of this overarching principle, we address what constitutes a valid determination and announcement on the record that a criminal defendant’s waiver of his or her right to a jury trial was made…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Conyers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Abeokuto v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- State v. BellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- State v. ZimmermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Szwed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
- Morgan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Hallowell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- Spence v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.