Legal Opinion

Nalls & Melvin v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 23, 2014No. 54/13PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreene, J.

In this opinion, we address challenges that have arisen since the issuance of our decision in Valonis & Tyler v. State, 431 Md. 551, 66 A.3d 661 (2013). In that case, we held that trial judges must comply with Maryland Rule 4-246(b) in order to accomplish the purpose of the Rule, that is, to protect the personal and fundamental constitutional right of a criminal defendant to a trial by jury. In light of this overarching principle, we address what constitutes a valid determination and announcement on the record that a criminal defendant’s waiver of his or her right to a jury trial was made…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Conyers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. Abeokuto v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. State v. BellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  5. State v. ZimmermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Szwed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  2. Bailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  3. Morgan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  4. Hallowell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  5. Spence v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API