Wilson v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
RAKER, Judge.
The primary question we address in this appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in permitting the State to use statistical data and a product rule computation to prove the improbability of two Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (“SIDS”)1 deaths in a single family. We shall hold that because the evidence did not satisfy the test we adopted in Reed v. State, 283 Md. 374, 391 A.2d 364 (1978), which guides the admissibility of expert testimony in Maryland, the trial court abused its discretion in admitting the evidence.
*196Garrett Eldred Wilson, petitioner, was convicted by a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- In Re Commitment of SimonsIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. AlbrightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Blackwell v. WyethCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Clemons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- State v. BabyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.