Legal Opinion

Harden v. Harden

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 9, 1942No. 30375PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

This appeal involves the right of plaintiff in error, defendant below, to collect interest on a judgment for alimony pending appeal to this court from a decree granting her a divorce and awarding her alimony.

In 1935 Elizabeth Harden brought suit against Andrew J. Harden for a divorce, division of property and alimony. She contended that all or nearly all the real property then standing in the name of Andrew J. Harden, her husband, was property jointly acquired during coverture and sought an equal division thereof in settlement of her property rights.

In the decree she was granted a divorce,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Harding v. HardingIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Bates v. DresserSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Stanfield v. StanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. Blankenship v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  5. De La Rama v. De La RamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Arnold v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  2. Dixon v. DixonAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Williams v. BudkeMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  4. M. E. Trapp Associated v. TankersleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  5. Independent School Dist. No. 65 v. StaffordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API