Stanfield v. Stanfield
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District .Court, 'Craig County; Chas. G-. Watts, Assigned Judge. Application by Winifred T. Stanfield for an order requiring Wade S. Stanfield to show cause why he should not pay alimony past due, and for the determination of the amount due, with motion by defendant for the modification of the original decree. Motion of defendant denied, and amount due applicant on past installments fixed, and she brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
The questions for review herein arise out of an attempt on the part of the plaintiff in error to enforce and collect a certain judgment and decree for alimony awarded .to her toy the United States court for the Northern judicial district of the Indian Territory, sitting at Vinita, on the 21st day of October, 1905. Certain phases of the cause have been before this court for review on a former appeal, wherein an opinion was rendered ¡fully stating the facts from the commencement of the original action up to the time the order complained of herein was entered. Stanfield v. Stanfield, 22 Okla.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sistare v. SistareSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Stanfield v. StanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
3Cited by17 opinions
- Messenger v. MessengerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Headley v. HeadleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
- Nantz v. NantzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Harden v. HardenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Grattan v. TillmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.