Anderson v. Taylor
California Supreme Court
Appeals from a judgment for the plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial, in the County Court of Mono County. Leavitt, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Ross, J.:
These appeals are embodied in one transcript, and were heard and submitted together.
The counsel who appeared for the appellants at the argument very properly conceded that the purported statement on motion for a new trial cannot be considered for any purpose. There is, therefore, left in the case but one question.
The action was forcible entry and detainer. The case was tried before a jury, and the following verdict returned: “ We, the jury in the above-entitled cause, find the defendants (naming them) guilty of the forcible entry and detainer set forth in the complaint, and we assess…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hicks v. HerringCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Kower v. GluckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
3Cited by6 opinions
- Chapman v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- San Francisco & Suburban Home Building Society v. LeonardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Martin v. DeetzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Daluiso v. BooneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Hitchcock v. PrattMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.