Clark v. Hamilton Diamond Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WASTE, C. J.—
The plaintiff brought an action in claim and delivery for recovery of the possession of a diamond ring alleged to be of the value of five hundred dollars. Judgment went for the plaintiff and the defendant Cohen has appealed, contending that he is a Iona fide purchaser of the ring without, knowledge of defect of title, and is entitled to a reversal of the judgment.
The appeal is on the judgment-roll alone, and the findings show that plaintiff sold the ring to Harry Justice, who “ fraudulently gave a worthless check in payment therefor.” Justice traded the ring to one Dye as payment…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Levi v. BoothCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1882
- South San Francisco Packing & Provision Co. v. JacobsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Pacific Acceptance Corp. v. Bank of ItalyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
3Cited by14 opinions
- Weyerhaeuser Timber Co. v. First National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1934
- Allen Dudley & Co. v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
- Handley Motor Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Handley Motor Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Parker v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.