Shanley v. Hadfield
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
— In this action for personal injuries sustained while appellant was crossing the Pacific Highway on foot on August 8, 1920, after night, a verdict .for $4,000 in his favor was set aside and judgment n. o. v. rendered for respondent by the trial court. Respondent had previously moved for nonsuit at the close of appellant’s case, and thereafter at the close of all of the testimony, the motions being at the times denied.
Respondent was the owner and driver of a stage running between Seattle and Tacoma. The complaint *193alleges that appellant, at the time in question, was crossing the highway and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Burlie v. StephensWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- Hartley v. LasaterWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Helliesen v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
- Fluhart v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
- Mouso v. Bellingham & Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Jensen v. CulbertWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Mount Olive Mfg. Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Pettijohn v. WeedeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
- Colwell v. NygaardWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Norris v. HadfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.