Legal Opinion

Norris v. Hadfield

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1923No. 17661PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

— This action for damages arose out of the same automobile accident as the case of Shanley v. Hadfield, ante p. 192, 213 Pac. 932. The principal facts are there related. A car belonging to this appellant was standing eight or ten feet west of the paved portion of the Pacific Highway, and twenty feet south of the combination building comprising- the gasoline station, cigar stand and dance hall. The emergency brakes were set on the car of appellant and the tail light was burning. The car of respondent, which was *199a Pierce-Arrow stage, as was said in the preceding-case, was running- in a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hellan v. Supply Laundry Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Jaquith v. WordenWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Ross v. Smith & BloxomWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Anderson v. McLarenWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Shanley v. HadfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McCurdy v. Union Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Holmes v. RaffoWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Osborne v. CharbneauWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Jellum v. Grays Harbor Fuel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Western MacHinery Exchange v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API