Legal Opinion

Simeone v. Simeone

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 25, 1990No. 70 E.D. Appeal Dkt. 1989PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY *, Justice.

At issue in this appeal is the validity of a prenuptial agreement executed between the appellant, Catherine E. Walsh Simeone, and the appellee, Frederick A. Simeone. At the time of their marriage, in 1975, appellant was a twenty-three year old nurse and appellee was a thirty-nine year old neurosurgeon. Appellee had an income of approximately $90,000 per year, and appellant was unemployed. Appellee also had assets worth approximately $300,000. On the eve of the parties’ wedding, appellee’s attorney presented appellant with a prenuptial agreement to be…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Carrier v. William Penn Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Hillegass EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Kaufmann EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Gelb EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. Samuel-Bassett v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. In Re Marriage of BondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Randolph v. RandolphTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Denlinger, Inc. v. DendlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Porreco v. PorrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API