Legal Opinion · Dissent

Board of Com'rs v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 19, 1938No. 1592Published

1DissentWilliams, Circuit Judge

*453Items in Exhibit B, as a part of plaintiff’s bill, herein sued for, are as follows:

Tax Paid................$2,141.86

Penalty .................. 231.35

Redemption Fees........ 39.00

Sewer Assessments ....... 1,014.40. $3,426.61

Said exhibit shows that this homestead had been platted into Homestead Valley Addition to the City of Tulsa prior to 1923, and into lots and blocks, and a sewer assessment, commonly called a “tax,” of $1,-014.40, without any penalty or other fee, having been paid, was sued for.

I concur in that part of the judgment for the recovery of the ad valorem tax and penalty and fees…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Broadwell v. Board of Com'rs of Bryan Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Service Feed Co. v. City of ArdmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Powell v. City of Ada, Okl.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  4. Board of Com'rs of Garvin Co. v. DennisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Grotkop v. Stuckey, Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API