Board of Com'rs v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1DissentWilliams, Circuit Judge
*453Items in Exhibit B, as a part of plaintiff’s bill, herein sued for, are as follows:
Tax Paid................$2,141.86
Penalty .................. 231.35
Redemption Fees........ 39.00
Sewer Assessments ....... 1,014.40. $3,426.61
Said exhibit shows that this homestead had been platted into Homestead Valley Addition to the City of Tulsa prior to 1923, and into lots and blocks, and a sewer assessment, commonly called a “tax,” of $1,-014.40, without any penalty or other fee, having been paid, was sued for.
I concur in that part of the judgment for the recovery of the ad valorem tax and penalty and fees…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Broadwell v. Board of Com'rs of Bryan Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Service Feed Co. v. City of ArdmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Powell v. City of Ada, Okl.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- Board of Com'rs of Garvin Co. v. DennisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Grotkop v. Stuckey, Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.