Legal Opinion
Powell v. City of Ada, Okl.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 26, 1932No. 609PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.
The appellant is the owner of street improvement bonds issued by the appellee in 1918. A part of the cost of the improvement ($5,609.58) was assessed against the abutting property of one Daniel Hayes, a restricted Indian. He declined to pay the assessments. On July 30,1928, appellant made a demand upon the officials of the city that they re-assess the cost of the improvement against the legally assessable property of the improvement district. The officials did not immediately eomply with such demand, and this action was brought shortly thereafter. The amended petition…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Hitchcock v. GalvestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- United States v. CandelariaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Bowling & Miami Investment Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- New Orleans v. WarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. City of CorrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Munro v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
- City of Orlando v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
- Glenn v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Gray v. City of Santa FeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
- City of McLaughlin v. TurgeonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.