Legal Opinion
Grotkop v. Stuckey, Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 2, 1929No. 18987PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIFFENDAFFER, C.
May 6, 1925, Vi-nita C. Grotkop commenced an action in the district court of Tulsa county against W. W. Stuckey, county treasurer of Tulsa county, Alfred O. Comstock, Gordon L. Smedley, and Comstock-Smedley Company, in which she sought to enjoin the issuance of a tax deed by the county treasurer to the defendants for a tract of land described as block 13 in 'Capitol Hill Second addition to the city of Tulsa. In her petition she alleged that she is a one-thirty-second Mood Cherokee Indian enrolled opposite No. 11917, and a member of the Cherokee Tribe of Indians ; that, as…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Choate v. TrappSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- New Jersey v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
- Sweet v. SchockSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
3Cited by7 opinions
- Powell v. City of Ada, Okl.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- Board of Com'rs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
- Board of Com'rs of Garvin Co. v. DennisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Board of County Com'rs v. Kiowa Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Wrightsman v. StevensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.