Legal Opinion

Board of Com'rs of Garvin Co. v. Dennis

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 10, 1929No. 19160PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, C.

There is but one question presented by this appeal, to wit, whether or not an assessment for benefits for drainage purposes against the unrestricted allotment of an intermarried white member of the Chickasaw Tribe of Indians is- legal and binding when made while the title to the allotment remains in the original allottee and within a period of 21 years from the issuance of the. patent.

The case was tried upon an agreed statement of facts. A. B. Dennis was duly enrolled as a member of the Chickasaw Tribe of Indians as an intermarried white citizen, and received an allotment on May 18,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Choate v. TrappSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Illinois Central Railroad v. DecaturSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. City of Sapulpa v. LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Tucker v. LeonardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Estate of Pigeon v. StevensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Powell v. City of Ada, Okl.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  2. Cochran v. NorrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Board of County Com'rs v. Kiowa Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Wrightsman v. StevensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Missouri State Life Ins. v. Board of County Com'rsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API