Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Hillman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1919No. 15517PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for ■ King county, Ronald, J., entered April 26, 1919, deny- , ing a petition to vacate a judgment, after a hearing 1 before the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

The history of the cause as to preceding litigation between these parties concerning the : subject-matter still in controversy will he found in Gordon v. Hillman, 91 Wash. 490, 158 Pac. 96; State ex rel. Gordon v. Smith, 98 Wash. 100, 167 Pac. 91, 169 Pac. 468; Gordon v. Hillman, 102 Wash. 411, 173 Pac. 22; and State ex rel. Hillman v. Superior Court, 103 Wash. 288, 174 Pac. 14.

The original decree, which was affirmed in Gordon v. Hillman, 91 Wash. 490, 158 Pac. 96, while it fixes the plan by which the rights of the parties in relation to matters with which we are now immediately con- ! cerned…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Claflin v. DunneIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Cochrane v. ParkerColorado Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. Gordon v. HillmanWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Seeley v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  5. Gordon v. HillmanWashington Supreme Court · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moon v. BullockIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Barker v. MoraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  3. Gordon v. HillmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Hillman v. GordonWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  5. West Coast Life Insurance v. MoriWashington Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API