Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Hillman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1918No. Nos. 14243, 12186PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Petitions to recall remittiturs and for leave to vacate a judgment, filed in the supreme court April 26, 1918.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

We have here before us two concurrent petitions by the petitioners to recall remittiturs heretofore issued from this court, and also for leave to vacate judgment upon facts alleged in one of the petitions under the practice first authorized by this court in Post v. Spokane, 28 Wash. 701, 69 Pac. 371, 1104. The cause was originally before us on appeal by the petitioners, who were defendants in the case of Gordon v. Hillman, 91 Wash. 490, 158 Pac. 96, an equitable action for rescission of contracts of sale of real and personal property, where a judgment and decree of the lower court was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Danforth v. DanforthIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Phelan v. TylerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Post v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Gordon v. HillmanWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Peabody v. City of EdmondsWashington Supreme Court · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tunnell v. Edwardsville Intelligencer, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Kosten v. FlemingWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Calkins v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Gordon v. HillmanWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  5. In re Conservatorship of FrankeNebraska Supreme Court · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API