Legal Opinion

Speight v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 19, 1989No. 87-1369PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KERN, Senior Judge:

In October 1986, Congress enacted the District of Columbia Judicial Efficiency Improvement Act, Pub.L. No. 99-573, § 2(a), 100 Stat. 3228 (codified at D.C.Code § 11-1732 (1988 Supp.)) (the Act). 1 The Act, inter alia, 2 authorized hearing commissioners to serve on a permanent basis in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia and empowered them to “make findings” and “enter final judgments” in non-jury criminal trials of non-felony offenses and in other proceedings. With respect to final orders and judgments entered by hearing commissioners, the Act specifically…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Palmore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Palmore v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Graves v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Dinkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. District of Columbia v. EckDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Arlt v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Bratcher v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. McFarlin v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Thompson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Dorm v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API