Legal Opinion

Dorm v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 14, 1989No. 88-630PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERREN, Associate Judge:

Appellant was convicted of taking property without right, D.C.Code § 22-3816 (1988 Supp.), at a bench trial before a hearing commissioner with appellant’s consent, see D.C.Code § 11-17320(5) (1988 Supp.); Super.Ct.Crim.R. 117(c) (1987). 1 He contends the commissioner committed reversible error by admitting certain facts into evidence over his objection. Appellant failed to raise this issue before the trial court in his motion for review of the hearing commissioner’s findings and judgment. See D.C.Code § ll-1732(k) (1988 Supp.). Accordingly, we must affirm.

Appellant’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Speight v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Pryor v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Kwakye v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jerome Bradley v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Arlt v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. In Re BrownDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API