Legal Opinion

Thompson v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 18, 1992No. 91-CM-1256PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEADMAN, Associate Judge:

Appellant and Sharon Curtis were arrested together and each charged with solicitation for lewd or immoral purposes under D.C.Code § 22-2701(a) (1989).1 On the first day of trial, Ms. Curtis pled guilty; the trial proceeded, however, against appellant. After the bench trial, at which Ms. Curtis, appellant, and one of the detectives testified, appellant was convicted of the crime charged.

Appellant argues that he cannot be convicted of inviting, enticing, persuading, or addressing Ms. Curtis for lewd or immoral purposes when she has already pled guilty to inviting,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In re T.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Abdulshakur v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Dinkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Turman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Rose v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McNeil v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Moten v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. McNeil v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. Mehari v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API