Legal Opinion

Rhodes v. Winn-Dixie Greenville, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 5, 1967No. 18662PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Littlejohn, Justice.

Myrtle Rhodes fell on the floor and was injured while shopping in the store of Winn-Dixie Greenville, Inc. She has sued Winn-Dixie in tort for personal injuries and in a separate suit her husband, Arthur Rhodes, has sued for medical bills and for loss of consortium. The two cases were consolidated for trial. The jury found a verdict in favor of the plaintiff wife, Myrtle Rhodes, and a verdict against the plaintiff husband, Arthur Rhodes. For simplicity, the Myrtle Rhodes’ case will be referred to as the wife’s case; Arthur Rhodes’ case will be referred to as the husband’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lorick & Lowrance, Inc. v. Julius H. Walker & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  2. Ramer v. HughesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Austin v. Stokes-Craven Holding Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  2. Moore v. ParksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  3. Stevens v. AllenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  4. Orangeburg Sausage Co. v. Cincinnati InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  5. Camden v. HiltonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API