Legal Opinion
Phoenix Technologies Ltd. v. VMware, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 1, 2016No. Case No. 15-cv-01414-HSG(DMR)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON VMWARE’S MOTION TO COMPEL
Donna M. Ryu, United States Magistrate Judge
In this copyright infringement case, Defendant VMware, Inc. (“VMware”) moved *1098to compel in camera review and production of documents withheld by Plaintiff Phoenix Technologies Ltd. (“Phoenix”) upon its assertion of attorney-client and work product privileges. [Docket No. 79.] On April 14, 2016, following a hearing, the court granted VMware’s motion in part, and ordered Phoenix to submit for in camera review documents withheld solely on the basis of the work product doctrine. [Docket No. 92 (Minute Order).] Having…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re Grand Jury Investigation. United States of America v. The Corporation 1Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. RicheyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America v. Mark Torf, Torf Environmental Management, in Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America, Dennis D. Ellis, Intervenor-Appellant. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America, Dennis D. Ellis, Intervenor-Appellant. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America, Ponderosa Paint Manufacturing, Inc., Intervenor-Appellant. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America, Ponderosa Paint Manufacturing, Inc., Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Richard A. Frederick, and Randolph W. Lenz, Karin Lenz, and Kcs Industries, Inc., InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chaudhry v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- In re Carvana Co Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
- King County v. Viracon IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
- Sweet v. Mesa, City ofDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
- Taction Technology, Inc. v. Apple Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2023