Legal Opinion
Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 25, 2012No. Case No. C 11-1846 LHK (PSG)PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART APPLE’S MOTION FOR AN ADVERSE INFERENCE JURY INSTRUCTION
PAUL S. GREWAL, United States Magistrate Judge.
In this patent infringement suit, Plaintiff Apple Inc. (“Apple”) seeks an adverse inference jury instruction against Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., LTD. (“SEC”), Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (“SEA”), and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (“STA”) (collectively “Samsung”).1 Samsung opposes.2 At issue is whether Samsung took adequate steps to avoid spoliation after it should have reasonably anticipated this lawsuit and elected not to disable the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- In Re Oracle Corp. Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- The United States v. Hudson and GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
- Fujitsu Limited v. Federal Express CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Skyline Steel, LLC v. PilePro, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Compass Bank v. Morris Cerullo World EvangelismDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2015
- Reinsdorf v. Skechers U.S.A., Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2013
- Rembrandt Techs., LP v. Comcast of Fla./Pa., LP (In Re Rembrandt Techs. LP)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.