Legal Opinion

In re Carvana Co Securities Litigation

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided August 13, 2025No. 2:22-cv-02126Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 United Association National Pension Fund, No. CV-22-02126-PHX-MTL et al., 10 ORDER Plaintiffs, 11 v. 12 Carvana Company, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pending before the Court is the Parties’ “Joint Discovery Motion” regarding the 16 twelve confidential witnesses (“CWs”) cited in the Amended Consolidated Complaint 17 (“ACC”) for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws. (Doc. 171 at 2.) For the reasons 18 explained below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part. 19 I. Background. 20 In support of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. TanninenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Sapir v. C.P.Q. Colorchrome Corp. (In re Photo Promotion Associates, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. TorfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Phoenix Technologies Ltd. v. VMware, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API