Legal Opinion
King County v. Viracon Inc
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided October 26, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00508Unknown
1Opinion
1 The Honorable Barbara J. Rothstein 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 KING COUNTY, Civil Action No. 2:19-cv-508-BJR 9 Plaintiff, v. ORDER REGARDING WITHHELD 10 DOCUMENTS 11 VIRACON, INC., 12 Defendant. 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 15 Defendant Viracon, Inc. (“Viracon”) fabricated and sold insulating glass units (“IGUs”) 16 installed on an office building in Seattle, Washington. Plaintiff King County owns the building 17 and claims that the IGUs are defective. The County instituted this lawsuit against Viracon, 18 asserting three…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Federal Trade Commission v. Grolier Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- In Re Grand Jury Investigation. United States of America v. The Corporation 1Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America v. Mark Torf, Torf Environmental Management, in Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America, Dennis D. Ellis, Intervenor-Appellant. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America, Dennis D. Ellis, Intervenor-Appellant. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America, Ponderosa Paint Manufacturing, Inc., Intervenor-Appellant. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America, Ponderosa Paint Manufacturing, Inc., Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.