Legal Opinion

City of Palmdale v. Board of Equalization

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 23, 2012No. B232833PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MALLANO, P. J.

In this appeal from the granting of a petition for a writ of administrative mandate, the parties have filed a motion to settle the case pursuant to a stipulation requiring that we vacate the trial court’s judgment and reinstate the agency’s decision. We deny the motion for vacatur because the interests of the public would be adversely affected if the judgment were vacated.

In particular, the judgment faults a state agency—which allocates local sales tax revenues among cities and hears taxpayer appeals concerning corporate and personal income taxes—for rendering a decision…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Neary v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Hardisty v. HINTON & ALFERTCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Weatherford v. City of San RafaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Collins v. Union Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Kinney v. Clark, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  4. City of Fontana v. Cal. Dep't of Tax & Fee Admin., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. City of Fontana v. Cal. Dep't of Tax & Fee Admin., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API