Legal Opinion

Contra Costa Cnty. Children v. J.D. (In re B.D.)

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided May 24, 2019No. A155254; A155571PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STREETER, ACTING P.J.

*809I. INTRODUCTION

In these consolidated appeals, G.D. (Mother) and J.D. (Father) (collectively, *743Parents) appeal from an order and findings entered at a Welfare and Institutions Code1 section 366.26 hearing (.26 hearing) terminating their parental rights to eight-year-old B.D. (Minor), adopting a permanent plan of adoption, and determining that Parents failed to meet their burden of establishing the applicability of the beneficial parental relationship exception under section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(B)(i). Also before us are two motions, one from Mother asking us to take…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. In Re Zeth S.California Supreme Court · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re A.N. CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2020
  2. In re E.F. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. In re N.B. CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. In re N.M. CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API