Legal Opinion

State v. Baumgartner

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 2001No. 20010169PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] The State appealed from an order dismissing two counts of criminal conspiracy to take game in excess of the legal limit charged against Richard C. Baumgartner. The State contends the district court erred in its decision that two undercover wardens were co-conspirators and accomplices to the crime charged. The State further contends the district court erred in its decision Baumgartner was entrapped as a matter of law. We conclude the wardens are not accomplices and Baumgartner was not entrapped as a matter of law. Therefore, we reverse and remand.

[¶ 2] On…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. HoweNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. LindNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. KennerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. RambousekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. MurchisonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. BluntNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. HammerenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. SchmidtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. BrownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Coppage v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API