State v. Schmidt
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Kari Ann Schmidt appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a bench trial finding her guilty of criminal attempt to possess methamphetamine. We affirm the judgment, concluding substantial evidence exists to warrant the conviction and a rational trier of fact could find Schmidt failed to prove entrapment by a preponderance of the evidence. However, because the judgment erroneously states that it was entered upon a guilty plea, we remand to the district court to correct this clerical error.
I
[¶ 2] In August 2010, a West Fargo police officer, assigned to the Drug…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. LivelyWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. MurchisonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. KummerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. RaiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. WattsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
- State v. WattsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
- State v. RaiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019