Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 2018No. 20180091; 20180092PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Crothers, Justice.

[¶ 1] The State appeals a district court order dismissing with prejudice felony charges of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver against Mitchell James and Taelor Brown. Because the production of hash oil is "manufacturing" as defined in N.D.C.C. § 19-03.1-01(17), and because the district court made a mistake of law regarding the possession with intent to deliver charge, the State met the burden of proving probable cause. We reverse and remand.

I

[¶ 2] In December 2017 Mitchell James and Taelor Brown were charged with possession with intent to manufacture…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. HoweNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. BluntNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. BergerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. O'Hara v. SchneiderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  5. People v. LenteSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HowardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API