State v. Hammeren

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Justin T. Hammeren appealed from a criminal judgment entered following a jury verdict finding him guilty of delivery of a controlled substance. We conclude the trial court did not err in denying Hammeren’s motion for judgment of acquittal based on entrapment as a matter of law or in denying Hammeren’s requested jury instructions regarding contributing to the delinquency of a minor. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] On November 30, 2000, law enforcement officers received information from an adult confidential informant that Hammeren, age 16 at the time, was involved in drug-related…