Batchis v. Leask
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, George Leask and others, as trustees, etc., from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 6th day of December, 1911, upon the decision of the court, rendered after a trial at the New York Special Term, overruling the defendants’ demurrer to the complaint.
1Opinion of the Court
Clarke, J.:
The plaintiff is the assignee of a beneficiary under the will of Hudson Hoagland, and the defendants are the executors and trustees.
The complaint alleges that the 17th clause of the will gave and bequeathed to the executors $75,000 intrust, to pay over the income of $25,000 thereof to Charles E. Hoagland during *714his life, and, upon his death, leaving a child or children surviving him, to pay over the principal of said sum to said child or children; that, according to the, terms of said will, other sums of moneys were to he paid over to the defendants to be held in trust for other…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Hoffman v. NaglerCity of New York Municipal Court · 1954
- Hellman v. PlossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Milberg v. NaglerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1959
- Batchis v. LeaskAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912