Bailey v. LeBeau
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Chief Judge.
To prevent a manifest injustice, we, ex mero motu, suspend the rules of appellate procedure to review all aspects of this case and reverse portions of the judgment and remand the case for a new trial on plaintiffs claim for breach of express warranty. Rule 2, N.C. Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Defendants first contend that the evidence in this record is insufficient to support a finding that defendant Pioneer Coach made any warranty to plaintiff. We disagree. The evidence in the record tends to show that Pioneer Coach advertised the sale of the automobile in a magazine…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ellis v. Smith-Broadhurst, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Pake v. ByrdCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Hunsucker v. CorbittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Williams v. Hyatt Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Vickery v. OLIN HILL CONST. CO., INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Mosley & Mosley Builders, Inc. v. Landin Ltd.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Hageman v. Twin City Chrysler-Plymouth Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1988
- Allen v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Prichard Enterprises, Inc. v. AdkinsDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2012
- Anders v. Hyundai Motor America Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.