Pake v. Byrd
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.
In order to determine the rights of the parties under these facts, we must first resolve the threshold question of whether, under the provisions of N.C.G.S. 25-2-313, defendants expressly warranted to plaintiff that the tractor was in good condition and free from major mechanical defects.
The statute states in pertinent part:
Any affirmation of fact or promise made by the seller to the buyer which relates to the goods and becomes part of the basis of the bargain creates an express warranty that the goods shall conform to the affirmation or promise.
N.C. Gen. Stat. §…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- General Specialities Co. v. Nello L. Teer Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Blade v. SloanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
3Cited by24 opinions
- Keith v. BuchananCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- In re Nexus 6P Prods. Liab. Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Keegan v. American Honda Motor Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
- Harbour Point Homeowners'assoc., Inc. Ex Rel. Bd. of Dir. v. Djf EnterprisesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Bussian v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.