Legal Opinion

Hunsucker v. Corbitt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 2, 1924PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

Tbe defendant’s first grouping of assignments of error relates to exceptions 1 and 55. “Tbe court committed error in overruling tbe motion made by tbe defendant Corbitt Buggy Company for a judgment as of nonsuit, for that tbe plaintiffs’ alleged cause of action is barred by tbe three years statute of limitations, as appears from tbe pleadings, and for that tbe plaintiffs bad not paid tbe costs in a prior suit between tbe same parties upon tbe same alleged cause of action before bringing tbe present action.” “Tbe court charges you, if you believe all tbe evidence, you will answer that issue…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Daniel v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Rankin v. OatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. Francis v. W. J. & J. G. Edwards & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  4. Morgan v. Royal Benefit Society & Royal Fraternal Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  5. Alpha Mills v. Watertown Steam Engine Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1895

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hildebrand v. . Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Fisher v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. State v. . LassiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Carter v. . Motor LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. Smith v. . KappasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API