Shields v. King
California Supreme Court
J. Hampton Hoge and A. M. Runnells for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
The judgment entered in each of the above-entitled cases is hereby affirmed. The reasons impelling this conclusion are properly set forth in one opinion as by stipulation of the parties, the actions were tried together before a jury and both appeals by defendánt argued in a single set of briefs.
On November 22, 1926, by reason of an accident which resulted from defendant’s alleged negligence and failure to use ordinary care in the operation of his automobile, plaintiff Bertha A. Shields received severe personal injuries for which by said first case, S. F. No. 13012, she and her husband seek to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Marchetti v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
- Dowd v. Atlas Taxicab & Auto Service Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Parmenter v. McDougallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Curran v. Earle C. Anthony, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1926
- Nichols v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
- Benjamin v. NoonanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Malone v. ClemowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Van Fleet v. HeylerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Queirolo v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.