Legal Opinion

Schlesinger v. Kofsky-Moos, Inc.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided December 31, 1934Published

1Opinion of the CourtMcMahon, J.

The plaintiffs, as chairman and treasurer of the Code Authority Board of the Fur Dressing and Fur Dyeing Industry, bring this action to recover the amount of an assessment levied upon defendant, a corporation engaged in the industry of dressing and dyeing furs, to defray the expenses of the Code Administration for the months of May, June, and July, 1934. The rate of the assessment, one-half of one per cent of the net volume of business for such period, was fixed by Administrative Order No. 161-23 issued by the Administrator for Industrial Recovery August 8, 1934, approving the Code Authority…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Edye v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Cohen v. SmallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  3. People ex rel. Westbay v. DelaneyNew York Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Halkin v. HumeCity of New York Municipal Court · 1924
  5. Richmond Hosiery Mills v. CampDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API