State ex rel. Reams v. Dusha
Lucas County Court of Common Pleas
1Opinion of the Court
*611OPINION
By STAHL, J.
It is the claim of the defendant that the Code so established and approved by the President does not authorize the fixing of prices at all, but the court is of the opinion that §§4 -(a), (bi) and (c), and §5 are intended to and do authorize the fixing ’of a minimum retail price. Indeed, it seenis to the court that except for the policing of the Division-and the enforcement of the various rules above referred to, the only matter that can affect the industry at all is the *612fixing of minimum prices. In his recent address to the country President Roosevelt referred to price…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States v. Spotless Dollar Cleaners, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1934
- Richmond Hosiery Mills v. CampDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1934