Legal Opinion

Cartmell v. Urban Renewal & Community Development Agency of the City of Maysville

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 4, 1968PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Commissioner.

For the third time we are called upon to consider litigation which has arisen incident to condemnation proceedings in Mays-ville by the Urban Renewal & Community Development Agency of Maysville (hereinafter URA). See Cartmell v. Urban Renewal & Community Development Agency of City of Maysville, Ky., 419 S.W.2d 719, and Cartmell v. Urban Renewal & Community Development Agency of City of Maysville, Ky., 430 S.W.2d 649, decided June 14, 1968. A general background of the matters involved may be had by reference to the just cited decisions, but we recount so much of the facts…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Idol v. KnucklesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1964
  2. Cartmell v. Urban Renewal & Community Development Agency of MaysvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1967
  3. Cartmell v. Urban Renewal & Community Development Agency of MaysvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1968

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ratliff v. Fiscal Court of Caldwell Cty., Ky.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Urban Renewal & Community Development Agency of Louisville v. International Harvester Co. of DelawareCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1970
  3. Urban Renewal & Community Development Agency of Louisville v. GoodwinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1974
  4. Anderson v. Urban Renewal & Community Development Agency of PaducahCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API