Legal Opinion
Cartmell v. Urban Renewal & Community Development Agency of Maysville
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided October 20, 1967PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEINFELD, Judge.
Owners of real estate in Maysville whose property is about to be taken under a plan for urban renewal and rehabilitation brought this action to enjoin the taking. From a judgment dismissing their suit they have appealed. We affirm.
In April 1967 the Urban Renewal and Community Development Agency of the City of Maysville sued Louis and Cecile Brown in one action; Alice S. O’Neill in another and William H. Cartmell, et al in the third, to condemn the parcel of land owned by each of them. KRS Chapter 99. Each answered and alleged that the agency had “no right to condemn the land…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Vaughn's Adm'r v. Louisville N. R. Co., Etc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
- Ewald's v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
- Wallace v. Ashland Oil & Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1957
- Peters v. Board of Education of Hardin CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
- Stillpass v. Kenton County Airport Board, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cartmell v. Urban Renewal & Community Development Agency of the City of MaysvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1968
- Cartmell v. Urban Renewal & Community Development Agency of MaysvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1968